This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.70. The documents are numbered through, 1-84, and there is therefore perhaps 15% less material in the categories named for 1881 compared with 1880.
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.71, except that there is no separate section for Anandapoor. The documents are numbered through, 1-188 - in number these holdings look somewhat larger than the equivalent for 1880, but in actual…
This volume follows the organisation of C-1.72. The documents are numbered through, 1-169. Both in number and size the Malabar correspondence of this year is substantially larger than in any of the preceding years. 1882 - in this year the…
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.70, except that there is no sub-division of the section of documents from the General Conference Executive Committee. The documents are numbered through, 1-106. Diez' long memorandum 1882 about…
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.71, except that there continues to be no separate section for Anandapoor. The documents are numbered through 1-122, and although in volume there seem to be more than in 1881, this year follows 1881…
This volume contains the following sections: Calicut (36 documents); Kodakal (12); Palghat (13); Keti (22); Kotageri (16). In 1883 this series returns to the pattern documented in detail for 1880 - the year’s correspondence is divided into…
This Volume follows the same organisation as C-1.70, except that there are no sub-divisions in the section for the correspondence of the General Conference Executive Committee. The documents are numbered through, 1-98.
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.71, except (1) that the section on the Canara district is divided into the sub-headings "Kanara District Conference and Synod", and "District Executive Committee". (2) There continues to be no separate…
This volume combines the contents of C-1.79 and C-1.80, retaining the same organisation of sections - except that as with C-1.82 the section on the district administration is divided into the subsections "District Conference and Synod" and "District…
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.82, except that for the first time a section is labelled "Basrur", bound in between Karkal and Honowar. The documents are numbered through 1-149. NB an address by the Tulu congregations on the occasion…
This volume contains the following sections: General Conference Executive Committee (36 documents); South Mahratta district [with no sub-sections] (21); Dharwad (23); Hubli (7); [Gadag] Betgeri (36); Guledagudda (18) and - for the first time…
This volume consists of the following sections: District Conference and Synod (25 documents); District Conference Executive Committee (28 documents); Mangalore (42); Mulki (11); Udipi (20); Karkal (9); Basrur (8); Honowar (15); …
This volume consists of the following sections: Malabar District Conference and Synod (18 documents); District Conference Executive Committee (19); Cannanore (6); Tellicherry (21); Chombala (16); Calicut (21); Kodakal (10); Palghat (11); …
This volume corresponds in structure to C-1.87. It is numbered through, and contains 203 documents. A General Conference was held in Calicut in November 1886 and the documents generated are at General Conference Executive Committee Nos. 1-24. One…
This volume corresponds in structure to C-1.88, except that there is now a station section for Kasergod bound in between those for Honowar and Mercara/Madikeri. It is numbered through and contains 225 documents.
This volume correspons in structure to C-1.89. It includes, however, a new station section for Waniyankulam, with 21 documents, bound in between the sections for Kodakal and Palghat. It is numbered through, and consists of 225 documents. The…
All historical documents and images (including titles) on www.bmarchives.org are provided solely for the purpose of information about historical processes and events. They are presented unchanged and are intended to be used for research purposes only. They reflect the norms and attitudes of their time and may be found offensive. They are in no way an expression of the convictions and attitudes of Mission 21 and the Basel Mission in the present. The transparent and scientific reappraisal of mission history is an important concern of Mission 21 and the Basel Mission.