This volume corresponds in structure to C-1.88 with the additional section for Kasergod begun in 1886. It is numbered through and consists of 222 documents.
This volume corresponds in structure to C-1.88, except that there is now a station section for Kasergod bound in between those for Honowar and Mercara/Madikeri. It is numbered through and contains 225 documents.
This volume consists of the following sections: District Conference and Synod (25 documents); District Conference Executive Committee (28 documents); Mangalore (42); Mulki (11); Udipi (20); Karkal (9); Basrur (8); Honowar (15); …
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.82, except that for the first time a section is labelled "Basrur", bound in between Karkal and Honowar. The documents are numbered through 1-149. NB an address by the Tulu congregations on the occasion…
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.71, except (1) that the section on the Canara district is divided into the sub-headings "Kanara District Conference and Synod", and "District Executive Committee". (2) There continues to be no separate…
This volume follows the same organisation as C-1.71, except that there is no separate section for Anandapoor. The documents are numbered through, 1-188 - in number these holdings look somewhat larger than the equivalent for 1880, but in actual…
The size and organisation of this volume corresponds to C-1.62, except that there are no sub-sections for the District officials, and no minutes of a District Conference or a District Synod. The documents are numbered through the volume. It contains…
500 numbered pages, all used. The bulk of the letters are addressed to the Canara District Executive Committee and its officials. A random search turned up one letter addressed to the Executive Committee of the Kanara Synod, and another addressed…
All historical documents and images (including titles) on www.bmarchives.org are provided solely for the purpose of information about historical processes and events. They are presented unchanged and are intended to be used for research purposes only. They reflect the norms and attitudes of their time and may be found offensive. They are in no way an expression of the convictions and attitudes of Mission 21 and the Basel Mission in the present. The transparent and scientific reappraisal of mission history is an important concern of Mission 21 and the Basel Mission.
